Which clinical finding is considered definitive for diagnosing pericardial effusion?

Enhance your NCCPA recertification preparation. Access multiple choice questions with hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

The presence of electrical alternans is a clinical finding that can be considered definitive for diagnosing pericardial effusion, particularly when the effusion is significant enough to cause this specific electrocardiographic pattern. Electrical alternans refers to a phenomenon where there is a variation in the amplitude or axis of the QRS complexes on the electrocardiogram, which can be observed with varying beats. This finding is suggestive of a swinging motion of the heart within a large volume of fluid, characteristic of considerable pericardial effusion.

Other findings, while they may suggest the presence of pericardial effusion, do not possess the same degree of specificity. For example, a heart murmur can be present for a variety of reasons and does not specifically indicate fluid accumulation. A friction rub is more indicative of pericarditis rather than effusion itself. A crunching sound, or Hamman's sign, is associated with pneumothorax or mediastinal emphysema and not specifically with pericardial effusion.

Thus, the identification of electrical alternans on an ECG is a more definitive finding for pericardial effusion, linking it closely with the hemodynamic compromise that this condition can cause, especially

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy